Marriage Registry translation needed. Giuseppe Barbara and Nunziata Frisina ?

Having problems with the Italian language? Do you need help to translate or understand an old family document? There is always someone who can help you!
Post Reply
Dunio1962!
Elite
Elite
Posts: 371
Joined: 03 Sep 2020, 04:06

Marriage Registry translation needed. Giuseppe Barbara and Nunziata Frisina ?

Post by Dunio1962! »

http://dl.antenati.san.beniculturali.it ... ewsIndex=0
Image 34 # 31 Giuseppe Barbaro and Nunziata Frisina ?

Can I please have this record translated. Please include the date and time. The names of the parents as well as professions of all, if able?
Thank you
John
AngelaGrace56
Master
Master
Posts: 7468
Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 10:54

Re: Marriage Registry translation needed. Giuseppe Barbara and Nunziata Frisina ?

Post by AngelaGrace56 »

Marriage No 31: Giuseppe Barbaro e Nunziata Frisina

Oppido Mamertina: 3 December 1864

Marriage was celebrated in the church of S. Nicola Superiore on 5 December 1864

Groom: Giuseppe Barbaro, 25 yo, born in Oppido, a bracciale, living in Oppido, the son of Salvadore, a vaticale (Carrier/Carter/Hauler), living in Oppido, and of Pasqualina Zindato, also living in Oppido.

Bride: Nunziata Frisina, 21 yo, born in Oppido, living in Oppido, daughter of the deceased Domenico Frisina, and of Francesca Buda, living in Oppido.

The above is the vital info. I'll read through the attachments that were presented and post shortly.


Edit to Add:

Following on....

The attachments (allegati/processetti) listed include:

1. Birth Certificate of the Groom
2. Birth Certificate of the Bride
3. Death Certificate of the father of the bride.
4. Death Certificate of the paternal grandfather of the bride.
5. The Notificazione Certificate (the marriage banns) (This is basically posted to show that there was no opposition to the marriage.)

(Well I got all excited because I thought there was going to be about 8 or so attachments, and then when I read the 3rd attachment listed, I realised there was something wrong – when microfilming they had actually duplicated Marriage Act No 31 so page 2 of Marriage Act No 31 appears as Image 36 and then again as Image 37)


Angela
Post Reply