Help with church marriage act translation

[barbeta]

Hi everyone

I need help on trying to get the data from the marriage act of Alberto CHIAVETTA and Giuseppa CONIGLIO.
I'm assuming the handwriting is in latin.

Some of the data I've already identified:

• Date: 3-feb-1807 (I don't know why it also has "1806" on the right margin)
• Groom: Albertum Chiavetta (Alberto)
• Bride: Josepha Coniglio (Giuseppa)
• Father of the groom: Angelo Chiavetta
• Father of the bride: ???

It seems it doesn't have age of the spouses or the name of the mothers right?
Is there any more info you can identify?

thanks!!!

[liviomoreno]

Hi everyone

I need help on trying to get the data from the marriage act of Alberto CHIAVETTA and Giuseppa CONIGLIO.
I'm assuming the handwriting is in latin.

Acta de matrimonio por iglesia - 1.jpg
Acta de matrimonio por iglesia - 2.jpg

Some of the data I've already identified:

• Date: 3-feb-1807 (I don't know why it also has "1806" on the right margin)
• Groom: Albertum Chiavetta (Alberto)
• Bride: Josepha Coniglio (Giuseppa)
• Father of the groom: late Domenico Chiavetta
  
• Mother of the groom: Angela
• Father of the bride: late Francesco
  
• Mother of the bride: Maria

It seems it doesn't have age of the spouses or the name of the mothers right?
Is there any more info you can identify?

thanks!!!

[barbeta]

Hi everyone

I need help on trying to get the data from the marriage act of Alberto CHIAVETTA and Giuseppa CONIGLIO.
I'm assuming the handwriting is in latin.

Acta de matrimonio por iglesia - 1.jpg
Acta de matrimonio por iglesia - 2.jpg

Some of the data I've already identified:

• Date: 3-feb-1807 (I don't know why it also has "1806" on the right margin)
• Groom: Albertum Chiavetta (Alberto)
• Bride: Josepha Coniglio (Giuseppa)
• Father of the groom: late Domenico Chiavetta
  
• Mother of the groom: Angela
• Father of the bride: late Francesco
  
• Mother of the bride: Maria

It seems it doesn't have age of the spouses or the name of the mothers right?
Is there any more info you can identify?

thanks!!!

Thank you very much Livio!
There's no mention of the age of the groom, bride or parents right?

[liviomoreno]

No ages

[barbeta]

No ages

thanks sir!

[barbeta]

I don't know why, but browsing throu some non-indexed church records at family search, I've found other version of the same marriage (same date, same people) with more text, but not sure if it has more data (like ages, dates, place of birth or residence, etc)

It's the marriage on the top-right part of the page:

This one seems more readable than the one before, but still the latin is confusing for me

[barbeta]

maybe one is the pubblicazione and the other is the act? any help with the data on it is really appreciated!

[mmogno]

Can you post the links to these documents?

[barbeta]

Can you post the links to these documents?

Sure thing:
First record: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903 ... at=1006969


Second record: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903 ... at=1006969

Thanks!

[PippoM]

It's so weird, as the cover of the first register says "marriages of the Parish of Santa Lucia form 1797 to 1807", and the second "marriages of the Parish of Santa Lucia form 1803 to 1814", so some must be duplicated. On the other hand, it seems that some of the records from the first register are deleted, or have some annotations about the need the record other marriages. My guess is that from 1804 someone realized the work was not well done, and transcribed records from then on to a new register.

[barbeta]

It's so weird, as the cover of the first register says "marriages of the Parish of Santa Lucia form 1797 to 1807", and the second "marriages of the Parish of Santa Lucia form 1803 to 1814", so some must be duplicated. On the other hand, it seems that some of the records from the first register are deleted, or have some annotations about the need the record other marriages. My guess is that from 1804 someone realized the work was not well done, and transcribed records from then on to a new register.

that's definitly an option. The other one would be that one of the books is the one originally stored at the church and the other is the copy sent to the main dioceses?