Catasto Onciario

[mmogno]

https://postimg.cc/hQg2vC4L
https://postimg.cc/Xrc7yqg9

[luigirusso007]

The volume of the Onciary Cadastre of Monticelli, according to this list should have been formed together with San Pietro in Curolis. I have no direct knowledge of this. The volumes are kept at the State Archives in Naples. I would recheck both San Pietro in Curolis and Roccaguglielma.

[itrijay]

https://postimg.cc/hQg2vC4L
https://postimg.cc/Xrc7yqg9

I’ve seen this same list. But Monticelli is not with San Pietro in Curolis. It’s not with Roccaguglielma either. I’ve checked both catasti multple times. It seems to be missing. Or maybe there was never a Catasto made for Monticelli in Esperia. Nearby Pontecorvo and Sant’Oliva do not have one either. I know Pontecorvo was under Roman jurisdiction back then and not Naples. I thought Monticelli would be within the Kingdom of Naples but maybe it wasn’t.

[luigirusso007]

Monticelli was casale of Roccaguglielma in the district of Gaeta and province of Terra di Lavoro, belonging to the kingdom of Naples.
There are three alternatives: either an Onciario cadastre was not formed for Monticelli, the second is that all the volumes of San Pietro in Curolis (not just the final one) must be seen, and the third is that all the volumes of Roccaguglielma (not just the Onciario) must be checked: St. Peter in Curolis 1218-1219-1220; Roccaguglielma: 1223 to 1229. In case he checked only the final volume (the Onciary), to rule out any hypothesis it would be necessary to check them all.