Middle Name, or attached to first?

jamiecapaldi · Post by **jamiecapaldi** » 17 Sep 2011, 22:10

Does anyone know the reason why my ancestor was showing Francescantonio on the Index of a marriage record, but showing Francesco Antonio on the actual Record?

Tessa78 · Post by **Tessa78** » 18 Sep 2011, 02:44

Space?

T.

Italysearcher · Post by **Italysearcher** » 18 Sep 2011, 08:42

If he was given the full version by his family it might have morphosed to a connected name. If he was just known as Franco (Francesco) it would have stayed separate.

liviomoreno · Post by **liviomoreno** » 18 Sep 2011, 10:15

jamiecapaldi wrote:Does anyone know the reason why my ancestor was showing Francescantonio on the Index of a marriage record, but showing Francesco Antonio on the actual Record?

I think it is a mistake of the person that wrote the index.

jamiecapaldi · Post by **jamiecapaldi** » 18 Sep 2011, 22:56

Thank you all for your input. He was named Francesco on his Childrens Birth Certificate, so they must be separate - Francesco Antonio.

Cheers!

Middle Name, or attached to first?

Middle Name, or attached to first?

Re: Middle Name, or attached to first?

Re: Middle Name, or attached to first?

Re: Middle Name, or attached to first?

Re: Middle Name, or attached to first?