I did a little ancestry.com research and discovered that of my two paternal great-grandfathers who were born in italy:
- One seems to have naturalized as a US citizen long before my grandfather was born
- The other has a petition for naturalization dated two years before the birth of my grandmother (I'm not sure if there's some certificate that would still need to be issued but I assume it'd have occurred within those two years).
-----: Great-great grandfather/grandmother -> great grandmother -> grandmother -> mother -> me [/indent]
-----: Great-great grandfather/grandmother -> great grandmother -> grandfather-> mother -> me [/indent]
I've read these cases can get held up if you go with one route and the court thinks another route is more appropriate. To me both these paths seem pretty equivalent and if I had to choose I'd go with my grandmother since her side is more documented. But I wonder, since everything seems to be male biased, if the court would find the grandfather approach more suitable?
Either way I have to make the case to allow a great grandmother to pass citizenship before 1948, but in the grandmother route I'd also have to make the case for my pre 1948 born grandmother to pass it on to my mother.
What do you all think?

