Hello everyone,
Attached is the 1748 Marineo Riveli for Ciro Bongiorno where his father is Filippo.
Question for you -
Right below their daughter Giuseppa the name Antonio Bongiorno is also listed. Does it mention who Antonio is?
Thanks
Chris
1748 Marineo riveli
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
I’m understanding that Don* (title) Antonino Bongiorno was a diacono (deacon), and son of Ciro, who was the revealer of the info in the census about his family.
Erudita
Erudita
-
- Master
- Posts: 3427
- Joined: 11 Jun 2020, 18:31
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
Sounds good. Instead of "deacon" could it be that he was "of age" (di anno), meaning an adult?
-
- Master
- Posts: 3427
- Joined: 11 Jun 2020, 18:31
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
On second thought, it looks like a capital "D" and I can see the "c", so deacon makes more sense. Especially given his honorific title of Don.
I vote for Erudita.
I vote for Erudita.
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
Very interesting.
Thank you both.
I am curious why Ciro had his son the Deacon reveal the information to the tax collector. It is almost like Ciro was looking for a little extra benefit knowing his son was a Deacon.
Chris
Thank you both.
I am curious why Ciro had his son the Deacon reveal the information to the tax collector. It is almost like Ciro was looking for a little extra benefit knowing his son was a Deacon.
Chris
-
- Master
- Posts: 3427
- Joined: 11 Jun 2020, 18:31
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
I have an 1816 Rivelo in which the 17-year-old son was the respondent on behalf of his father.
The father was age 74, only to die two years later, so perhaps he was not well at the time. Or he could have been out in the fields!
The son signed officially on behalf of his father: "in nome e parte di mio padre".
That formality doesn't seem to be the case in your document.
The father was age 74, only to die two years later, so perhaps he was not well at the time. Or he could have been out in the fields!
The son signed officially on behalf of his father: "in nome e parte di mio padre".
That formality doesn't seem to be the case in your document.
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
Chriscj11788 wrote: 12 Apr 2025, 16:51 Very interesting.
Thank you both.
I am curious why Ciro had his son the Deacon reveal the information to the tax collector. It is almost like Ciro was looking for a little extra benefit knowing his son was a Deacon.
Chris
The father Ciro revealed the info to the tax collector, not his son, the deacon. Sorry you misunderstood what I previously typed.
Erudita
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
Thank you Erudita.
Chris
Chris
Re: 1748 Marineo riveli
You’re welcome, Chris.
Erudita
Erudita